I know what my costume is for the next Con now…

(Source: indyfalcon, via salishere)

Trololol

(Source: raeosunshine, via salishere)

thomasthecat:

I really liked Into Darkness, but I think it’s interesting the wide range of reactions the movie has had from other die-hard fans. Some loved it and some hated it, and some really hate how Abrams and his team has approached the franchise as a whole.

Partly that stems from the way Abrams has…

The philosophy expressed in this post is why Star Trek Online is better than JJ’s reboot.

dunebat:

wilwheaton:

jenniferdeguzman:

He said Star Trek is too “philosophical”? Screw that noise.

mechcanuck:

I don’t know when this interview happened but I AM SAD AND ANGRY NOW 

The philosophies in Star Trek are kinda part of the actual setting. If you don’t get that, why are you allowed to make Star Trek movies.

Sigh. The whole point of Star Trek is that it’s philosophical. If you don’t want philosophical Science Fiction, there’s plenty of that for you to enjoy, but Star Trek is philosophical. Philosophy is part of Star Trek’s DNA, and if you’re given the captain’s chair, you’d better damn well respect that.

Screw. You. J.J. Abrams.

(Source: catbushandludicrous)

(via eternalroxas)

(Source: abductioncow)

yaypawnee:

I have endless amounts of love for Jim Rash

noordledoordle:

t-d-possum:

Star Trek TAS tho.  

“Captain, use the magic you know. Believe.”

amymebberson:

Pocket Princesses 59: Coronation

Please reblog, don’t repost.

In related news, my official Acme Star Wars print ‘Leia’s Story’ is available from Super 7 here